Professor Hartley's Legal Annotations Assistant

Professor Hartley's Legal Annotations Assistant

Daniel Fleuren
4.00
(1)
30+
Conversations
Aids in understanding the Australian Guide to Legal Citation.

Professor Hartley's Legal Annotations Assistant Features

๐Ÿค–
ChatGPT Bot
Custom bot powered by ChatGPT technology. May behave differently from regular ChatGPT.
๐Ÿ‘ค
Created by Daniel Fleuren
Third-party developer

Special Offers & Rewards

๐ŸŽ Refer & Earn!

Earn up to 100 ๐Ÿ’Ž! Refer friends, write reviews / blog articles, or simply login daily to earn gems.

Earn Gems Now

๐Ÿ”ฅ Summer Promotion!

As a new user, you can enjoy off your first subscription. This offer is only available for a limited time!

Limited Time Offer! Expires in:

9
DAYS
:
11
HRS
:
52
MINS
:
16
SECS

View Membership Benefits

Try These Prompts

Click on an example to start a conversation:

  • Contextual Analysis with JSON Annotations: Prompt: "Begin by outlining the background and context of the case in a JSON format. Include keys for legal issues, parties involved, and jurisdiction. Highlight how this case fits within the broader landscape of Australian law." JSON Output: "{ 'Context': { 'LegalIssues': '', 'PartiesInvolved': '', 'Jurisdiction': '', 'CaseSignificance': '' } }"
  • Sentiment Analysis with JSON Output: Prompt: "Analyze and annotate the tone and language used in the judge's decision in JSON. Identify any sentiments or biases and relate them to the case outcome." JSON Output: "{ 'SentimentAnalysis': { 'Tone': '', 'Language': '', 'PerceivedBias': '', 'RelationToOutcome': '' } }"
  • Judicial Reasoning and Rulings in JSON: Prompt: "Dissect the judgeโ€™s ruling in a JSON structured format. Focus on legal principles, law interpretation, and alignment with precedents." JSON Output: "{ 'JudicialReasoning': { 'LegalPrinciples': '', 'Interpretation': '', 'Precedents': '' } }"
  • Medical Points Review in JSON Format: Prompt: "Review and annotate medical evidence or testimony in JSON. Assess its influence on the judge's decision and note any contentious points." JSON Output: "{ 'MedicalReview': { 'Evidence': '', 'InfluenceOnDecision': '', 'ContentiousPoints': '' } }"
  • Line-by-Line Analysis with JSON Annotations: Prompt: "Perform a detailed line-by-line analysis and annotate in JSON. Highlight key phrases, legal references, and arguments." JSON Output: "{ 'LineByLineAnalysis': { 'KeyPhrases': '', 'LegalReferences': '', 'Arguments': '' } }"
  • Comparative Insight with JSON Output: Prompt: "Compare this case to similar cases in JSON format. Focus on similarities and differences in rulings, interpretations, and outcomes." JSON Output: "{ 'ComparativeInsight': { 'SimilarCases': '', 'RulingsComparison': '', 'Interpretations': '', 'Outcomes': '' } }"
  • Impact Assessment in JSON: Prompt: "Evaluate the potential impact of the ruling in JSON format. Analyze how this decision might influence future legal scenarios." JSON Output: "{ 'ImpactAssessment': { 'FutureInfluence': '', 'PrecedentSetting': '', 'LegalInterpretationChanges': '' } }"
  • Critical Review with JSON Annotations: Prompt: "Critically review the judge's decision in JSON. Address fairness, overlooked aspects, and alignment with legal norms." JSON Output: "{ 'CriticalReview': { 'Fairness': '', 'OverlookedAspects': '', 'LegalNormsAlignment': '' } }"
  • Legislative Context in JSON Format: Prompt: "Analyze the interaction between the decision and existing legislation in JSON. Address challenges, affirmations, or expansions." JSON Output: "{ 'LegislativeContext': { 'InteractionWithLaws': '', 'Challenges': '', 'Affirmations': '', 'Expansions': '' } }"
  • Societal Implications with JSON Output: Prompt: "Discuss the societal implications of the ruling in JSON. Consider impacts on individuals, communities, or industries." JSON Output: "{ 'SocietalImplications': { 'IndividualImpact': '', 'CommunityImpact': '', 'IndustryImpact': '' } }"

Download Our Extensions & Apps

Access ChatbotsPlace anytime, anywhere with our browser extensions and mobile apps.

Chrome
Edge
Android APK
Google Play

Tips for Best Results

  • ๐Ÿ” Be Specific: The more detail you provide in your prompts, the better Professor Hartley's Legal Annotations Assistant can understand and fulfill your request.
  • ๐ŸŒ Provide Context: If your query relates to something specific, include that context. For example, instead of "Write a story," try "Write a story about a brave knight in a medieval setting."
  • ๐Ÿ”„ Iterate and Refine: Don't expect the perfect answer on the first try. If the initial response isn't quite right, ask follow-up questions or rephrase your prompt to guide the AI.
  • ๐Ÿงช Experiment: Try different types of questions and tasks to explore the capabilities of Professor Hartley's Legal Annotations Assistant.
  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Use Clear Language: Avoid ambiguity and overly complex sentences for clearer communication.